Next time you’re out in a mild drizzle take a look around. You’re bound to see a similar picture. Girls wearing standard issue DPW wading boots disguised with so-called “cute” designs or bold colors. Ladies, it just looks ridiculous. I mean look at this picture. Do you see rushing water, raw sewage or common street rats floating around? Do you even see rain? The girl doesn’t even have an umbrella. Was it misting a few hours prior?
And looking ridiculous isn’t the only issue. There’s now no question that girls are senseless trend consumers. Uggs pushed that myth to a theory (at least they provide warmth) but these boots have confirmed it as an undeniable fact. You’ve basically made two statements; 1) You’re incapable of dressing yourself without a glossy magazine to guide you, and 2) Weather.com is too complicated for you to understand. I will refuse to take you seriously as a human being with thoughts, ideas, and feelings if seen wearing these in weather short of monsoons, hurricanes or biblical floods. It’s your own fault.
PS: The final issue I missed the first time through deals with equality, because anyone that really knows me can tell you I'm all about fair but equal. Men don't have such an option for utility. Why is this an acceptable trend for women? Can you imagine the scene this would cause if men started showing up to the office or barista jobs wearing galoshes every time there was the slightest threat of a drizzle? Corporate meetings would be held, memo's would be e-mailed and new dress codes enforced.
PS: The final issue I missed the first time through deals with equality, because anyone that really knows me can tell you I'm all about fair but equal. Men don't have such an option for utility. Why is this an acceptable trend for women? Can you imagine the scene this would cause if men started showing up to the office or barista jobs wearing galoshes every time there was the slightest threat of a drizzle? Corporate meetings would be held, memo's would be e-mailed and new dress codes enforced.
